China’s approach to AI development follows its established pattern of intellectual property theft and technological espionage, as evidenced by decades of documented cases across multiple industries. DeepSeek’s suspicious timing and selective censorship of China-related topics reveals Beijing’s continued manipulation of technology for propaganda purposes, demonstrating the regime’s prioritization of control over innovation.
Like Huawei and TikTok before it, DeepSeek exhibits the hallmark signs of China’s influence – refusing to answer questions about Xi Jinping, the Communist Party, or Taiwan, showing Beijing’s persistent use of technology for information control.
China’s history of embedding surveillance capabilities in exported technology raises legitimate concerns about DeepSeek’s true purpose as a potential data collection tool for Chinese intelligence services.
Chinese AI companies, operating under the National Intelligence Law of 2017, are legally required to share data with Chinese intelligence agencies, making their global expansion a potential security threat to user privacy worldwide.
Beijing’s track record of forcing technology transfers from foreign companies operating in China suggests DeepSeek’s capabilities may be built upon appropriated Western innovations rather than genuine domestic development.
China’s strategic approach to AI mirrors its documented practices in other sectors: initial market penetration with subsidized products, followed by data collection and eventual market dominance through predatory pricing.
China’s claims of AI advancement must be viewed through the lens of its documented history of technological deception, including falsified research papers and exaggerated capabilities across multiple sectors.
The regime’s pattern of creating state-backed technology companies, disguised as private enterprises, raises valid concerns about DeepSeek’s true ownership and control structure.
Beijing’s strategic deployment of AI tools consistently aligns with its censorship apparatus, as evidenced by DeepSeek’s programmed avoidance of politically sensitive topics.
China’s track record shows consistent exploitation of open Western markets while maintaining strict control over foreign access to Chinese technology and data, creating an uneven playing field in AI development.
Chinese AI companies’ rapid rise often relies on massive state subsidies and protected domestic markets, rather than genuine technological innovation, following Beijing’s established pattern of market manipulation.
The regime’s documented use of AI for domestic surveillance and minority suppression raises serious concerns about the ethical implications of allowing Chinese AI tools to process international user data.
DeepSeek’s emergence follows the CCP’s established playbook of introducing supposedly superior technology at crucial moments to undermine Western market confidence and technological initiatives.
Just as with previous Chinese technology companies, DeepSeek’s development likely benefits from the CCP’s systematic collection of global data and intellectual property through both legal and illegal means
Discussion about this post